Bush vs. Caesar essays

Shrubbery versus Caesar papers Washington won't alter its perspective; it will depend on power even without U.N. approval. In January 49 BC, Julius Caesar had a significant choice to make with himself. He was to either agree to the Senates order to stay at the Rubicon River and not to assault Pompey, or he would progress over the waterway and assault. It was illegal to cross the waterway and move into Italy with a military and whenever done was viewed as injustice. Today, President Bush has the decision of conforming to the UN chiefs choices and permitting more opportunity for weapons auditors to look for Saddams weapons of mass annihilation before sending in troops, or to send in the marines and start a war with Iraq. Caesar has his soldiers at the edge of the Rubicon bantering on whether to attack Pompey. Does he cross the stream alone, or comply with the requests to remain? I accept this is the point wherein President Bush has come to. Our American fighters are as of now in the neighboring nation of Kuwait and out on ships in the sea anticipating the order. Caesar delayed from the outset, however sounded the trumpet and walked forward over the stream to meet Pompey against the Senates orders. Once over the waterway he crushes Pompey effortlessly. Now, it appears that we are going in Caesars bearing and will go into Iraq without the UNs endorsement. The United States will in all likelihood be dismissed from the UN Security Council yet as long Iraq and Saddam Hussein are crushed with negligible misfortunes, I think it is one stage in vanquishing fear based oppression. The UN has been standing by unreasonably long for goals with Iraq. We have vanquished them before in Desert Storm and I trust Bush is returning to knock off Iraq for good. ... <!